needhelp!
10-12 12:06 PM
don't forget to dial in after your meet & greet.
wallpaper I Love You More Jls. love you
kondur_007
05-19 04:50 PM
To me, it means that they will issue an RFE to ask you about the new (self-employed) job and description of your job duties in the new job, compensation etc. And they should match with original LC.
I have a personal belief that this is a complicated thing in itself and depends largely on the job title, job descriptions and your qualifications mentioned on LC. It would be a good idea to discuss the specifics with a competent attorney before taking any step that might lead you to a new greencard from scratch. Good Luck.
I have a personal belief that this is a complicated thing in itself and depends largely on the job title, job descriptions and your qualifications mentioned on LC. It would be a good idea to discuss the specifics with a competent attorney before taking any step that might lead you to a new greencard from scratch. Good Luck.
cdeneo
04-06 08:38 PM
Bumping this thread up...
I would appreciate if an attorney on this forum could please chime in on this query. Thanks!
I would appreciate if an attorney on this forum could please chime in on this query. Thanks!
2011 I Think Of You Jessica
kirupa
05-16 02:28 PM
You should work on the colors a bit more! I think there are too many gradient colors in that stamp :)
more...
pnjbindia
07-08 07:09 PM
are you guys saying that the "costs" for the medical exams can be reimbursed by our insurance companies? I did not know that... In case that is true, I will submit mine for reimbursement...
thanks for the info..
thanks for the info..
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
more...
immigrant2007
03-21 11:52 AM
Please change the title to "300 Illegal Immigrants with Criminal Records Arrested in Texas". Don't set a false alarm.
technically by definition how an an illegal achieve the status of immigrant? I gues you meant illegal aliens? just kidding
technically by definition how an an illegal achieve the status of immigrant? I gues you meant illegal aliens? just kidding
2010 I love people that bring a
archpai
12-07 10:24 PM
Hi,
I took my 2.5 year old to the FP.
The security officer did not ask anything about him.I was allowed to go with my son.There was no problem.
I took my 2.5 year old to the FP.
The security officer did not ask anything about him.I was allowed to go with my son.There was no problem.
more...
STK
02-08 02:01 AM
I've received my EAD+AP and I 485 (filed, priority date Nov 05) through my husband's GC process. I currently work on H1B (3 yrs remaining on my H1B). One week ago got laid off and working with same company till end of month. While looking for new job I'm unable to decided whether to maintain my H1-B status or switch to EAD.
1) If I switch to EAD and husband has problems in I485 approval, can I switch back to H1B for remaining time or do I fall under H1 cap and start from beginning.
2) Should I transfer to H4 before leaving job and then look for new job with EAD to save remainder of time on H1B which I can use if something goes wrong with EAD.
3) Would it be safer to get H1B transfer to new employer and forget EAD till husbands I-485 gets approved.
4) If I get a job on EAD, do I've to file something with INS to let them know that Im not working on H1B. If getting back on H1B from EAD, do I file regular H1B application through employer or process is different if you get back from EAD to H1.
Please help!!!!!! lay off from work is enough stress. I thought EAD would make life easier but more options means more confusion:confused:
1) If I switch to EAD and husband has problems in I485 approval, can I switch back to H1B for remaining time or do I fall under H1 cap and start from beginning.
2) Should I transfer to H4 before leaving job and then look for new job with EAD to save remainder of time on H1B which I can use if something goes wrong with EAD.
3) Would it be safer to get H1B transfer to new employer and forget EAD till husbands I-485 gets approved.
4) If I get a job on EAD, do I've to file something with INS to let them know that Im not working on H1B. If getting back on H1B from EAD, do I file regular H1B application through employer or process is different if you get back from EAD to H1.
Please help!!!!!! lay off from work is enough stress. I thought EAD would make life easier but more options means more confusion:confused:
hair I love you!
kirupa
12-16 08:10 PM
Hello Mike,
I was about to launch Swift 3D and try what you were having problems with, but I found another solution that might work better. The best thing I would recommend that you try would be to use Flash for all the modification of the keyframes, etc.
I always use a separate Movie instance in Flash to import all my Swift 3D animations. Also, for the sake of file size, I only work on one Swift 3D animation at once. I then import that animation and any other animations to Flash itself. Within Flash, you can customize how many times you wish for the animation to loop, crop out extraneous frames, etc.
Try that method. Use Swift 3D for the initial 3D rendering and animation. Use Flash for the keyframe modifications, etc. Swift 3D has a very clunky keyframe interface, and it is not very user friendly.
I hope that helped. If you have any further questions or comments, please don't hesitate to reply back.
Regards,
Kirupa Chinnathambi
www.kirupa.com (http://www.kirupa.com)
I was about to launch Swift 3D and try what you were having problems with, but I found another solution that might work better. The best thing I would recommend that you try would be to use Flash for all the modification of the keyframes, etc.
I always use a separate Movie instance in Flash to import all my Swift 3D animations. Also, for the sake of file size, I only work on one Swift 3D animation at once. I then import that animation and any other animations to Flash itself. Within Flash, you can customize how many times you wish for the animation to loop, crop out extraneous frames, etc.
Try that method. Use Swift 3D for the initial 3D rendering and animation. Use Flash for the keyframe modifications, etc. Swift 3D has a very clunky keyframe interface, and it is not very user friendly.
I hope that helped. If you have any further questions or comments, please don't hesitate to reply back.
Regards,
Kirupa Chinnathambi
www.kirupa.com (http://www.kirupa.com)
more...
desi3933
06-10 12:45 PM
Hi,
My H1 transfer got denied. My company said they are unlikely to file an MTR. I have a valid EAD and old company H1 (based on 140 approval) valid till Jan 2010.
Can i find other company and file a different H1 transfer based on my old company valid H1?
Please Advice.
Hi Vikram -
Since your H-1B transfer petition is denied, you are not in H1 status anymore. However, I would suggest consider applying for 3 year H1 based on approved I-140 (and PD is not current). It does not matter who applied for that I-140.
There is a chance that USCIS may approve this H1 without I-94. In that case, you need to get new visa stamp and reenter into US to get back into H-1B status.
Good Luck.
_______________________
Not a legal advice.
US citizen of Indian origin
My H1 transfer got denied. My company said they are unlikely to file an MTR. I have a valid EAD and old company H1 (based on 140 approval) valid till Jan 2010.
Can i find other company and file a different H1 transfer based on my old company valid H1?
Please Advice.
Hi Vikram -
Since your H-1B transfer petition is denied, you are not in H1 status anymore. However, I would suggest consider applying for 3 year H1 based on approved I-140 (and PD is not current). It does not matter who applied for that I-140.
There is a chance that USCIS may approve this H1 without I-94. In that case, you need to get new visa stamp and reenter into US to get back into H-1B status.
Good Luck.
_______________________
Not a legal advice.
US citizen of Indian origin
hot I LOVE YOU JESSICA
immi2006
07-02 08:55 AM
If you know sources from well known place pls quote.
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
No need to create rumor and panic. Sorry - no offence intended.
We are all stressed out as it is.. let us wait for official note on this.
I heard USCIS already retrogressed and rejecting Jul filer? is it true. need urgent help :mad: :mad:
more...
house 2011 i love you jessica poems.
immigration1234
08-26 11:18 AM
Hi
We have applied for I -485 last month.I am the primary applicant and my spouse is add on.Bothe of us are on H1B and it is valid till end of 2008.
I have applied for EAD and advance parole for my spouse only.We have not yet received the receipt numbers .I was wondering if we want to travel outside the country do we need to wait untill we get any of the above or if we have a valid H1B can we travel outside the country.
Thank you very much for your help.
We have applied for I -485 last month.I am the primary applicant and my spouse is add on.Bothe of us are on H1B and it is valid till end of 2008.
I have applied for EAD and advance parole for my spouse only.We have not yet received the receipt numbers .I was wondering if we want to travel outside the country do we need to wait untill we get any of the above or if we have a valid H1B can we travel outside the country.
Thank you very much for your help.
tattoo quot;I love you, Jessicaquot;
txh1b
08-19 02:07 PM
Fedex is fine. Proof that USCIS got the application is enough to use H1b portability provided you were in valid status and were getting paid.
more...
pictures I am sorry, Jess. I love you
rbharol
08-05 10:52 AM
http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/immigration/
dresses I love Jessica Simpson.
ItIsNotFunny
11-11 06:08 PM
Bump ^^^^^
more...
makeup 2011 i love you jessica poems
mchhokar
05-15 02:45 PM
Hi,
I am on L1 B (Individual) Visa since last three years. In January my company filed for extension, this time on L1 (Blanket). I received RFE in March, which my company replied in April. A couple days before the attorney called us mentioning the petition has been denied and I am awaiting final documentation.
Here are facts:
I am Senior Product Manager with Bachelor's in Computer Science and around 8 years of Experience working with the same Company. 5 years(India Subsidiary) and 3 Years US HQ.
We did mentioned in our RFE that I have the sole knowledge of two products that I represent and that with other things to convince USCIS.
My company is open and willing to appeal against the decision.
Questions: Could it be a reason that Attorney couldn't represent my case well and in that case should I reconsider other Attorney who is specialized in L1 process.
-Can appeal process buy me some time and should I start my H1B process simultaneously?
If yes, is that something which I can do legally.
-How much time can appeal process buy, is it two months, 4 months, 6 months ??
- My wife is on H1 and I do have 10 years B1 visa on my passport. Given those circumstances I do understant that my options for legally staying in US are open but I really want to avoid compromising options and save current working status.
I have been thinking-thinking a lot during last couple days and thus Any help and directions would be appreciated.
Regards,
Manu
I am on L1 B (Individual) Visa since last three years. In January my company filed for extension, this time on L1 (Blanket). I received RFE in March, which my company replied in April. A couple days before the attorney called us mentioning the petition has been denied and I am awaiting final documentation.
Here are facts:
I am Senior Product Manager with Bachelor's in Computer Science and around 8 years of Experience working with the same Company. 5 years(India Subsidiary) and 3 Years US HQ.
We did mentioned in our RFE that I have the sole knowledge of two products that I represent and that with other things to convince USCIS.
My company is open and willing to appeal against the decision.
Questions: Could it be a reason that Attorney couldn't represent my case well and in that case should I reconsider other Attorney who is specialized in L1 process.
-Can appeal process buy me some time and should I start my H1B process simultaneously?
If yes, is that something which I can do legally.
-How much time can appeal process buy, is it two months, 4 months, 6 months ??
- My wife is on H1 and I do have 10 years B1 visa on my passport. Given those circumstances I do understant that my options for legally staying in US are open but I really want to avoid compromising options and save current working status.
I have been thinking-thinking a lot during last couple days and thus Any help and directions would be appreciated.
Regards,
Manu
girlfriend Peer Minister - Jessica Sauve
nixstor
03-12 03:10 PM
At last my labor is approved and I was to planning to file my 140 under PP. How ever, I am reconsidering the thought as my wife is on H4 and she is being hired on a H1B from Oct1st. If my 140 is filed under PP and approved, her H1 is approved by June/July Can I transfer my H1 to another company to port my PD? What happens to my wife's H4? I am under the impression that she needs to file an extension as well along with me. This will have her H4 approved after H1 and she will need to re validate her H1 status by going out of the country.
Is it possible that my new employer request my H1 transfer and we chose not to request my wife's extension along with mine if she has 2+ years left from the extension we received based on my previous extension? If we have to file for her extension when I transfer (which I think) PP is of no use as Oct 1st 07 is 6+ months away.
Thanks
Is it possible that my new employer request my H1 transfer and we chose not to request my wife's extension along with mine if she has 2+ years left from the extension we received based on my previous extension? If we have to file for her extension when I transfer (which I think) PP is of no use as Oct 1st 07 is 6+ months away.
Thanks
hairstyles i love you jessica poems. i
glus
06-29 08:11 AM
Post date is NOT Important. What's important is the "delivered" date. Think about. USCIS can't and is not responsible for postal delays. If one sends a package and somehow it does not get delivered for 14 days, USCIS cannot mark the application received until and when it receives it, period.
Please check before posting untrue statements. So even if your application reaches the uscis on the July 3rd, but uscis enters your application to the system on August 1st, your filed date will be July 3rd. So don't worry. Make sure your package reaches USCIS in July and you will be OK.
Please check before posting untrue statements. So even if your application reaches the uscis on the July 3rd, but uscis enters your application to the system on August 1st, your filed date will be July 3rd. So don't worry. Make sure your package reaches USCIS in July and you will be OK.
ya3
04-09 07:13 AM
']ya3... i give you the torch... yo make a better one to get put up...
lol *bows*... you didn't do it right:sure:
I'll throw one together as soon as I get a chance :)
...lol, "chance"...:sure::):|
lol *bows*... you didn't do it right:sure:
I'll throw one together as soon as I get a chance :)
...lol, "chance"...:sure::):|
donsimahajan
06-22 09:27 AM
totally agreed.
No comments:
Post a Comment